Most people type around 40 words a minute. Most people talk at 120 to
150. That gap is the entire sales pitch for dictation software, so
here are the numbers, where they come from, and the part the pitch
usually skips: editing takes some of it back.
Typed
40
words per minute, the commonly cited average
Spoken
150
words per minute at the top of conversational pace (120 to 150)
Fig 1.A · Words per minute, raw entry
Composition figure: Karat et al., CHI 1999, which clocked average users
near 19 wpm when writing rather than copying. The 40 wpm average and the
120 to 150 conversational range are the commonly cited figures. A 2016
Stanford study (Ruan et al.) measured speech input at 3x keyboard speed,
on phone keyboards.
✓
Raw entry is roughly three times faster spoken than typed.
✓
The gap is widest when you compose. Typing drops to 19 wpm when you
also have to think of the words.
Fig 1.B · What the chart hides
Editing takes some of it back
Those bars measure entry, not finished text. Speak for a minute and
you get 140 words, a few of which you will delete. The engine
guesses a name wrong. You trim an "um, actually" you never noticed
saying. Spoken drafts also run wordier than typed ones, because
talking is cheap and typing makes you ration.
So no honest page promises 3x on finished prose. The Stanford study
still had speech ahead after corrections. Participants corrected
fewer errors during speech entry, although the final uncorrected
speech error rate was slightly higher. The margin on polished text is
smaller than the margin on raw words. The pattern that holds up:
dictation is much faster for getting a draft out of your head, and
the keyboard stays better at precision surgery. Moving one word two
lines up is not a job for your voice.
So when does the speed actually matter?
Speak it
✓
Email and replies. You already know what you want to say; the
keyboard is just the slow part.
✓
AI prompts. Long context typed at 40 wpm is a tax on every
question you ask.
✓
First drafts. The whole argument of
dictation for writers:
get the bad version out fast, fix it at the keyboard.
✓
Notes while your hands are busy, or on a day your wrists have
opinions.
Type it
•
Code. Syntax is not speech, and no wpm figure changes that.
•
Spreadsheets and forms, where entry is short and structure does
the work.
•
Precision edits: renaming, reordering, fixing one clause in a
finished paragraph.
•
Anything where you think slower than you type. Speed of entry
was never the bottleneck there.
Run the experiment
Test the numbers on yourself
You do not have to take a chart's word for it. macOS ships free
dictation; here is
how to dictate on a Mac
with the built-in tools. Dictate the same email you would normally
type and compare the clock. For the full menu of options, from
built-in to third-party, see
every way to do voice to text on a Mac.
Dictate is our app. It is built for the winning column above: hold a
key, talk, and the text lands where your cursor was, punctuation
included, with a polish step that trims the rambling before it hits
the page. One plan,
$8 a month flat.
Fig. Q · Questions
Speed questions
How much faster is dictation than typing?
For raw entry, roughly three times. Conversational speech runs 120 to 150 words a minute versus a commonly cited typing average of about 40. Editing narrows the gap, but spoken drafts are still faster.
Does editing cancel out the speed gains?
Some, but not all. You still need to fix misheard words and remove filler. Dictation is best for drafts; heavy rewriting reduces the advantage.
Is dictation worth it if I already type 80 wpm?
Yes. The gap narrows, but 80 words a minute typed is still below 120 to 150 spoken. Dictation remains useful for long emails, prompts, and first drafts.
Can dictation software keep up with normal talking speed?
Yes. Modern transcription keeps up with conversational speech. Background noise, unusual names, and later cleanup matter more than pace.
Talk at 150. Type at 40.
$8/month flat. Cancel any time; unused subscriptions refunded in full.